Dec 5, 2025
For months I've been making the argument that people should
stop watching WWE and definitely stop paying for their over-priced
PLEs (if they find the product unsatisfactory). $30/month for ESPN
Unlimited remains a prickly price point for me - I just can't
justify it. That said, I came very close to taking the plunge this
past weekend about an hour before Survivor Series: War Games. I
held steady though, and I'm glad I did because it doesn't seem like
I missed anything too spectacular.
For the first time in months, though, I don't think I'll be
able to abstain from The Royal Rumble and WrestleMania.
On the one hand, voting with my dollar is an entirely viable
option. On the other, depriving myself of two significant events in
wrestling, just to prove a point, doesn't sit well with me either.
If I'm frank with myself, my heart isn't in the point being proven.
My heart is in analyzing professional wrestling as an art and I
think dealing with unchecked capitlism is just a part of that
process in 2025.
To put things in even simpler (and more specific) terms, I
want to be able to talk to my friend, Al, about The Royal Rumble
and WrestleMania. And based on the response of my listeners, they
want us to talk about these events too. Those two facts have me
wondering what's best for myself and for my podcast.
If I do take the plunge I'd only do it for those two shows and
then cancel the membership. Perhaps that proves the point just
enough, that this structure doesn't work if they want sustained
subscribers.
Or maybe WWE and ESPN are perfectly happy to get $60/year from
a few fair weather fans.
In the shadow of Netflix's looming purchase of Warner Bros.,
my friend Cisco and I had a conversation over text about how planet
Earth is just one big corporation. The consumer might have more
choices in terms of the content they consume, but they have far
less agency as these massive organizations merge. By agency, I mean
a willingness (or ability) to not subscribe, a comfort with picking
and choosing, being shrewd.
With all of these streaming platforms starting to cross
pollinate, regardless of whether or not the consumer asked for it,
there's less incentive for the consumer to take any kind of action
at all (for or against the process). It's all just happening to us
and we're either too disinterested to care or too lazy to
unsubscribe. Subscribing to Peacock means also subscribing to Apple
TV. Subscribing to Hulu means also subscribing to Disney.
Subscribing to Netflix means also subscribing to HBO. And on and on
it goes until one day these services are just going to become one
great big pile of entertainment feed that we all mindlessly
consume.
I think the answer has to be exercising one's individuality,
however they can. Becoming shrewd in the face of overwhelming
capitalism. Doing the annoying thing of unsubscribing to these
services after you get what you actually want.
But maybe I'm just rationalizing?
Am I?
Am I just trying to find a way to justify breaking a promise,
or is it okay for me to buy The Royal Rumble and WrestleMania? Am I
a part of the problem?
Part of the problem of not subscribing to any of these
services is that you miss out on culture. For better and worse,
streamers contain modern culture, particularly as it relates to
prestige TV. Good TV show after good TV show is being pumped out on
a regular basis from all of these artists, or rediscovered through
these streamers. Ignoring that because you don't like the business
model, or you don't like what the culture has become, may make you
less capable of critiquing it accurately.
If I elect to not watch The Royal Rumble, for example, I'll be
out of touch with my listeners who have seen it. I won't
be able to connect with them about it. I value that connection
immensely. So much so that forsaking it in an attempt to "stick it
to the man" feels disingenuous.
If, for example, I reviewed a past Rumble and past
WrestleMania in place of the current ones, then I'm electing to
take The Work Of Wrestling podcast completely out of the
conversation, transforming my niche within a niche into a niche
within a niche within yet another niche. I'm not sure that's good
for anybody - me and listener alike.
Also, how will I know if ESPN Unlimited is or isn't worth
subscribing to if I don't actually try it out first? The only way
to really know is by watching The Rumble and Mania to see if both
WWE and ESPN are putting actual effort into its two biggest
PLEs.
I don't know the answer, but I think I'm talking myself into
subscribing just for January and April of 2026. Maybe the answer is
as simple as that.
All of this makes me lament the end of the WWE Network,
though, something I never thought I would've said back when it
launched in 2014. We're being squeezed from all directions, and
it's all starting to feel less fun, less like we have a choice, and
more like we have to bow down before our corporate overlords.
There must be some way to resist that process, even in a small
way.